First RTTY Contests with the IC-7600

June 18th, 2010

Actually there were two RTTY contests last weekend.  Both were new contests.  The DLDC took the place of ANARTS and was held June 13-14 in three 8-hour segments starting at 0800Z on the 13th.  During the DLDC off period on Saturday, the BARTG 75 Sprint took place.  It was a great opportunity for me to put the ‘7600 to the test in a real RTTY contest setup.

The results were pretty much what I thought they were going to be with one exception.  The ‘7600 was equal to the PRO III in all areas but one when it came to receive.  The only difference I did see was with the Twin Peak Filter (TPF).  When using the TPF on the PRO III, I would normally have to turn the RF gain control down until the S-meter reads between 10-20 dB in order for the noise floor to lower to the point where the signal-to-noise ratio “seems” to be the best.  I say “seems” because I can only measure this by ear or by the way weak signals print.  The ‘7600 seems to be quieter than the PRO III when using the TFP.  On the ‘7600, I only have to turn the RF gain down to where the S-meter reads S9 before I get the same signal-to-noise ratio that works best for weak signals.  I don’t know why this is or if this gives an edge to the ‘7600 over the PRO III or not.  I think more experience might tell.

The ‘7600 and the PRO III basically received the same over the course of both contest.  So there was no significant difference.  Since the bands weren’t crowded, the roofing filter in the ‘7600 was not a factor.  However, the spectrum display on the ‘7600 continues to be a major plus for this radio.  Not only can you set up the display to center on your transmit frequency, you can map the display for any band segment you want.  This means you can map the display to show just the RTTY subband on each band.  On 20 meters, I set it to show 14060-14150 kHz, on 40 meters, I set it for 7025-7060 kHz.  So with one push of a button, I could see the whole RTTY segment on whatever band I was on.  It was really cool and gave me a chance to take quick looks at the band segments to see if there was anything outside the area I was working in.

It was exciting to use the ‘7600 in a RTTY contest because it’s such a pleasure to operate.  But almost equally exciting this weekend was using a new Bluetooth wireless keyboard and keypad I purchased for my Dell laptop.  Because neither contest had a low power category, I decided to run amps on both radios.  When I set the station up earlier in the week and ran high power tests, I had bad RFI into the USB keyboard which is normally on the laptop.  The laptop is not my main PC and is only used when contesting SO2R.  I have a 17″ monitor, USB mouse and USB keyboard set up on the laptop and leave it on the side with the lid closed when contesting.  I tried getting the RFI out of the USB keyboard with ferrite rods but they didn’t work.  So I bought a Microsoft Bluetooth Mobile Keyboard 6000 which has a separate Bluetooth numeric keypad.  The keyboard is a mini keyboard since the number keypad is separate.  One problem I had was that since I run SO2R on two separate PC’s, having two full size keyboards on the operating desk is a pain in the butt.  And with the Icom radio tuning knobs offset to the right side of the radio, that means I would have to reach over the top of the right-side keyboard to tune the radio.   With the Bluetooth keyboard and keypad, I now have more space which is great.  Additionally, using WriteLog’s keystroke mapping utility, I can map important functions and macros to the keypad such as Insert, ESC, CQ and my callsign.  I am now able to push the mini keyboard farther off to the right and get it competely away from the front of the PRO III (right radio) and perform most of the contest using just the keypad.   There are a couple of things I don’t like about the Bluetooth keyboard and keypad.  The main problem is that if they are not used for a certain amount of time, they go to sleep to save the batteries.  So after they sit for a couple of minutes with no activity, the first keystroke wakes up the unit but is not delivered to the laptop.  Because both contests were somewhat slow compared to others, this occured a few times but I got used to it and remembered to hit the ESC key a couple of times before I started using the other keys.  I think this is a small inconvenience compared to opening up desk space in front of the radios.  I don’t like the curveature of the keyboard either because I’m just not used to it and have to twist my wrist out more in order for my fingers to be on the right keys.  In the future, I plan on mapping additional keys to the keypad to the point where I won’t need to use the keyboard much at all during contests.  The biggest plus to the purchase was that I no longer have RFI problems on the keyboard.  It worked great running 500 watts on all bands.

That’s it for now but am VERY excited about a new discovery inside the ‘7600.  It has a built-in soundcard!  I installed the USB driver for the radio last night and not only am I able to control the radio with CI-V through the USB connection, I now have a soundboard where I can direct the receiver’s audio directly to the MMTTY plug-in for WriteLog.  The new possibilities are intriguing.  It’s an exciting discovery that I will post next on the blog page.  Stay Tuned!

Testing the Icom IC-7600

June 1st, 2010

Ray Novak with Icom America was kind enough to loan me an IC-7600 so I could test it.  My main focus is to test it on RTTY mode, mostly for RTTY contesting.  The radio arrived on Friday, May 28, 2010 just hours before the start of the CQ WPX CW contest.  Naturally, I had to jump into the contest with it (more on that later).  In addition to this blog, I am writing a comprehensive set of web pages which chronicle my experiences with the new radio.  Since the web pages aren’t completed, this blog will act as a “tour” of my experiences until the pages are ready to be published.

The IC-7600 replaced the IC-756 PRO III at the low end of Icom’s line of “premier” radios which also includes the IC-7800 and IC-7700.  Nearly seven years ago, Ray sent me a pair of Icom IC-756 PRO III transceivers to test.  It didn’t take long to fall in love with the PRO III and I purchased one of the loaners and have used it as my “main” radio ever since.

In a way I was happy to see the ‘7600 come out because it lowered the price of a new PRO III sold as “close-out” to around $2300 and it incorporated many of the features of it’s bigger brothers – the ‘7700 and ‘7800.  The PRO III cost around $2800 when it was new.  I had thoughts of buying a second PRO III to use as the second radio in my SO2R RTTY contest setup to replace my aging Kenwood TS-870.  The biggest advantages to the PRO III over the Kenwood are the spectrum display and the Twin Peak Filter.  My review of the PRO III and comparison to the TS-870, along with a link to my test of the Twin Peak Filter, can be found at http://rttycontesting.com/icom756proiii/icom_ic756proiii_index.htm

When I saw the cost of a new ‘7600 at about $3800, I was surprised it was that high at first.  My initial reaction to the ‘7600 was that would be like a PRO III with roofing filters and a better display.  In four short days of playing with the ‘7600, I have found that it is much more than that.   It deserves the distinction of not being compared to the PRO III but I will do side-by-side comparisons with the PRO III in an effort to show what improvements have been made and what new features have been implemented.  As far as the price, I must say it seems fair.  Afterall, it’s been at least 8 or 9 years since the debut of the PRO III.  So for a radio that appears to be much better than the PRO III and includes three roofing filters (3, 6 and 12 kHz), the price seems appropriate.

The first thing that jumps out at you when you first turn the radio on is the display.  It’s much bigger and more clearer than the PRO III display.

The first real test was the CQ WPX CW contest.  And the first thing I noticed was the quality of the audio.  The audio seemed much stronger and clearer than the PRO III.  To make sure, I connected the PRO III next to the ‘7600 and listened to the two side-by-side.   The audio, at least on CW, is distinctively better coming from the ‘7600.  I couldn’t tell much difference in the actual filtering.  They seemed the same and I don’t know that the 3 kHz roofing filter gave the ‘7600 any great advantage during the contest because condx were lousy and the band was not that crowded until Sunday afternoon.

The first real test on RTTY was trying to copy E4X on 30 meter RTTY the day after the contest.  There was a strong interfering signal near the E4X mark frequency which made it nearly impossible to copy using the 250 Hz filter.  I decided to try the 200 Hz filter (not available in the PRO III) and was happily surprised with the results.  The results of this experience can be found at:

http://rttycontesting.com/icom_ic7600/e4x.htm

Feel free to join me as I take this radio for a ride.  Comments are greatly appreciated.

73, Don AA5AU

2010 February RTTY Contesting Survey

March 5th, 2010

The results of the 2010 February RTTY Contesting Survey are now available from the Lagniappe Page.  Thanks to all 825 RTTY contesters who participated in the survey.  Although I had hoped to get more partipants, I feel the results do give us a good idea of what’s going on in our radiosport.

The purpose of this blog is to allow you to comment on the results.  In considering the results, take a look at survey results from 2007 (also linked from the Lagniappe Page).  One interesting fact is that N1MM Logger has overtaken and outdistanced itself from WriteLog as the most used RTTY contest program.  Also, SO2R operators have increased only 1% in the last three years.

There are a number of things I could have done better.  For instance, in Question #1, I should have included RTCL and Fldigi.  RTCL is a popular program in Japan.  In Question #8, I should have placed a text box where users of “Other Radios” could have entered the radio they use that was not listed.  These improvements will be made in the next survey.  What questions would you like to see asked in the next survey?

Thank you for taking time to comment on the survey.

73, Don AA5AU

Welcome!

March 2nd, 2010

Welcome to rttycontesting.com.  This site is dedicated to RTTY Contesting with an emphasis on using WriteLog.  I know there are lots of RTTY contest programs available, but I love WriteLog.  I feel it’s the best RTTY contest program, especially for SO2R RTTY contesting.

The purpose of this website is to help others gain more knowledge about RTTY contesting and how to use WriteLog on RTTY.  And for all RTTY contesters, regardless of which program you use, I’ve included all kinds of information pertaining to RTTY contesting plus a Records Page where you can find contest records, links to contest rules and results.

Thank you for visiting rttycontesting.com.  Feel free to write your comments in this blog.  That is why it’s here.  Enjoy the site and I hope to see you in the next RTTY contest!

73, Don AA5AU